Study library
Interview guidesFor institutions

Normalize EBITDA

Reported EBITDA is 64 after a one-time cash litigation expense 9. Normalize EBITDA and calculate implied EV at 8x.

Amounts $m. Expense is included in EBITDA and genuinely nonrecurring. No other adjustments.

Worked answer

normalized: 64 + 9 = 73
ev: (64 + 9) × 8 = 584

Add back a genuinely nonrecurring EBITDA expense.

Apply the multiple consistently to the normalized metric.

Technical follow-ups

What evidence would you need before accepting management’s recurring restructuring addback?

How would your recommendation change if the same supposedly one-off expense appeared in each of the last three years?

Follow-up answer guide

Review recurrence, cash evidence, historical addbacks and business economics; repeated ordinary restructuring may be recurring even if management calls it one-time. Consistency across comparables matters.

A fresh retry

Reported EBITDA is 78, after an included genuinely one-time litigation expense of 6. Calculate normalized EBITDA and implied EV at 7.5×.

Amounts $m. Expense is included in EBITDA and genuinely nonrecurring. No other adjustments.
Inspect replacement inputs
reported: 78
expense: 6
multiple: 7.5
Check the retry bridge
normalized: 78 + 6 = 84
ev: (78 + 6) × 7.5 = 630

Original fictional example. Not a report of a specific firm’s interview. Explanations need qualified human review.